Re-Ordering for the Spiral
Re-Ordering Correspondence
The Principal Typology Spiral structure derives from the TET which contains all 7 Types of a Typology. The form is generated by two Cycles in which there is a progressive cumulation of Modes derived from the Types, leading to a succession of Stages.
The Spiral is a staged, i.e. time-based, development of a mechanism, the Primal Means, which serves the Primal Need of the originating .
Note: The concepts of Primal Means and Primal Need did not exist when specific
were being discovered and developed.The order of the Modes (Types) in this Stage-by-Stage process differs from the hierarchical order in a standard way.
The Table below uses
derived from as an example.:- Col. 1 lists the order of in the : a fine horizontal line divides Cycle-1 and Cycle-2.
- Col. 2 list the names (which are the same as the names)
- Col. 3 shows the from the
- Col. 4 shows currently used for derived from the .
- Col. 5 shows the «obvious» Root correspondence as previously explained.
Spiral Stage | Spiral Mode |
PH'1 Type |
Spiral Tree L |
Corresponding Root Level |
Psychosocial Pressure |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
φ7 | Systemicist | L'5 | CL7 | Change-RL3 |
Acceptability |
φ6 | Imaginist | L'7 | CL6 | Experience-RL4 | Well-Being |
φ5 | Empiricist | L'2 | CL5 | Inquiry-RL2 | Certainty |
φ4 | Rationalist | L'1 | CL4 | Purpose-RL6 | Autonomy |
φ3 | Dialectic | L'4 | CL3 | Communication-RL5 | Understanding |
φ2 | Structuralist | L'6 | CL2 | Willingness-RL7 | Selflessness |
φ1 | Pragmatist | L'3 | CL1 | Action-RL1 | Performance |
The Spiral, with its basis in the TET and functioning in wider psychosocial reality, provides a different approach to appreciating the postulated correspondence.
Generation of the Spiral
Investigation of Principal Typology methods reveal that each method is especially suited to a particular sort of case or situation, and unsuited in other cases or environments.
This phenomenon flows from the particular nature of the method, and is also expressed by their positioning in the TET. Adherents to a particular method typically seek the most suitable situation within a larger setting and often avoid other situations.
This highlights a key psychosocial phenomenon. When we focus on a complex endeavour, or a large organization, or a matter of much social significance over time, the use of all methods either simultaneously for different issues/situations, or at different points in time for similar issues/situations, is not just desirable but essential. The inescapable conclusion is that all methods deserve value, and there must be a way to include them all.
The Spiral is built on a simple finding that meets this requirement. It is quite possible to value the essential feature of a method (Type) and support its use without committing to always apply the method (Type) in full in every case (as adherents might well prefer).
A Mode is the socially-valued essence of a Type/Methopd supported by a number of associated relevant values.
Investigation of Spirals reveals that they develop through time in Stages during which Modes are sequentially added. As a cumulation of useful values comes to govern the larger entity e.g. an organization, a person, a social group, it becomes able to function in a more powerful way. This occurs without impinging on the integrity of Type-based methods—these can be used at any Stage of development.
In line with the conclusion reached in examining the Types, it is essential to understand Modes prior to understanding the Spiral as a complete process.
- See further analysis of Modes
Initially posted: 30-Nov-2013. Amended April-2015. Last updated: 3-Jan-2023.